← Search

Sarah Waterman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Simsbury, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 45W–48L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history93 matches
L
2026-04-12 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Carrozza
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-02-08 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patti Waller
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-16 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelly Chapman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-02-09 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelly Chapman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-01-12 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lucy Ferriss
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2024-11-24 · BTC:High Fives:Wright/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patti Waller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
W
2023-06-16 · Q SIMS:Love 'em and Leave 'em:Ort · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Walsh
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2023-05-13 · Q SIMS:Love 'em and Leave 'em:Ort · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Sloat
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2023-04-23 · FV:Addins:Bowman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Swapan Arora mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2023-03-19 · FV:Double Trouble:Tietje/Traceski · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathi Hefler
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2023-03-18 · SIMS:All In:Ort · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Vaughn
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2023-03-12 · FV:Addins:Bowman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffry Morton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
48.9%
23W–24L · 47.3% of games
7.0
50%
13W–13L · 51.7% of games
7.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 48.1% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
29 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams