← Search

Thomas Beggs

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
West Chester, PA
3.5A year-end 2024
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
46 matches · 20W–26L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history46 matches
W
2026-09-10 · VF Mountain Men · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Don Antonelli
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-31 · VF Mountain Men · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Olson
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-14 · VF Mountain Men · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Rist
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-23 · VF Mountain Men · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sam Pickel
loading the estimate
0-6
L
2026-06-30 · VF Mountain Men · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald Siggs
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-25 · VF Mountain Men · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald Siggs
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-20 · Haverford · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Stuccio
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-29 · Haverford · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deep Shah
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-02 · Haverford · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Brinker
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-08-17 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vernon Keesey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-08-15 · Mountain Men · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald Mutchnik
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-18 · Mountain Men · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hugh Davis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 49% of games
8.0
43.8%
14W–18L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe