Michael Ledet
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Covington, LA
93 matches · 65W–28L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history93 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-0
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2025
Carmelli/40/4.0/M/Stonecreek
Pausina-Eckholdt/40s/4.0/SC
Adult
Ledet/40/4.0/SC
Carmeli/40/4.0/Stone
Ledet/40/8.0/SC
Alphoso-StoneCreek Man/Cov
Ledet - Stone Creek Man/Cov
Fitzmorris-StoneCreek
Ledet - Stone Creek
Ledet 55
Neitzschman-Beau Chene
Carmeli/Arthur-StoneCreek
Carmelli-StoneCreek
Sanderson/Ledet - Stone Creek
Strain-Beau Chene
Appe/Singletary - Stone Creek
Arthur-StoneCreek
Atthur/Ledet - Stone Creek
Ledet-StoneCreek
Sanderson - Stone Creek
Tedesco/Arthur-StoneCreek
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
75%
6W–2L · 52.1% of games
4.0
36.8%
7W–12L · 41.2% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 60.8% of games
4.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 43.4% of games
7.0mixed
100%
14W–0L · 69.3% of games
8.0mixed
84.4%
27W–5L · 60.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
14 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.