← Search

Lisa Simons

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lawrence, KS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 17W–12L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history29 matches
W
2025-11-22 · Hildegard · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Hoffman
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-2
W
2025-11-22 · Hildegard · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Hoffman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-11-16 · KS/Wong-Hildegard/55&Over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Craig
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-11-16 · KS/Wong-Hildegard/55&Over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Craig
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-11-03 · North, Laura · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Manion
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2024-04-28 · Lee - Genesis, Topeka · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Craig
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-04-28 · Lee - Genesis, Topeka · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Craig
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-04-20 · Lee - Genesis, Topeka · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Craig
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-04-20 · Lee - Genesis, Topeka · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Craig
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
L
2023-06-24 · Lagerstrom, Claudia · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Lee
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2023-06-10 · Lagerstrom, Claudia · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leslie Stelzer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2023-05-13 · Lagerstrom, Claudia · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Lee
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 45.4% of games
8.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 54.9% of games
9.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams