← Search

Jane Boles

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Columbia, MO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 5W–13L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history18 matches
L
2025-06-09 · Jane Boles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hsinyeh Hsieh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-02 · Jane Boles · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hsinyeh Hsieh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-12 · Jane Boles · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hsinyeh Hsieh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2022-10-03 · Donna's Team · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Boles mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-09-29 · Donna's Team · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Boles mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2021-08-28 · Claudine's Team · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rosemary Jacobson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2021-06-22 · Feel the Ball · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vivian Kellar
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2021-06-15 · Feel the Ball · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosemary Jacobson
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2021-06-01 · Feel the Ball · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Still
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2019-07-17 · The Lobsters · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Boles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2019-06-26 · The Lobsters · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Boles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2019-06-25 · Lobsters · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christi Bergin
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
25%
2W–6L · 30.8% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe