← Search

Jonathan Degg

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lafayette, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 18W–58L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history76 matches
L
2026-11-01 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Antal Becze
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-28 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eric Olson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-15 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eric Olson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with LOUIS CASTANEDA
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-10 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM3.0C · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gordon Bonneville
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paul David
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM6.0B · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Keeling
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-28 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alan Roth
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-07 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM3.0C · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Keeling
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-28 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Ogden
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-03-08 · VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 40AM3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Hopkins
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-01-31 · VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 40AM3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Snowden
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
17.4%
4W–19L · 36.3% of games
6.0
20%
1W–4L · 43.8% of games
6.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 33.6% of games
7.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 27.3% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 27.3% of games
7.0mixed
30.4%
7W–16L · 39.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 59% of the time
#3 Doubles
59%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova