← Search

Kathleen Bourret

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Palm City, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 22W–28L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history50 matches
W
2025-03-21 · IRMSL/Wells/65&Over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anna Haman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-03-14 · IRMSL/Wells/65&Over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Murray
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-02-28 · IRMSL/Wells/65&Over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Murray
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-02-14 · IRMSL/Wells/65&Over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rebecca Fulper
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-01-31 · IRMSL/Wells/65&Over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Murray
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-01-17 · IRMSL/Wells/65&Over8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Murray
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Maria Vallecillo-Dunn championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Karin Decoste championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-12-17 · Nrs/DeGaetano · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Deborah Cone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-11-07 · IRMSL/Gore/65&OverW8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elisabeth Smith championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-5
L
2024-11-07 · IRMSL/Gore/65&OverW8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elisabeth Smith championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
W
2024-11-03 · IRMSL/Fulper/50&over8.5W · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
40%
6W–9L · 43.2% of games
8.0
60%
6W–4L · 52.9% of games
8.5
40%
10W–15L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal