← Search

Selena Kim

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cuyahoga Fls, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
269 matches · 156W–113L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history269 matches
W
2026-11-01 · CX 7.5 LT Kim · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Thomas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-10-25 · C 8.5W LT Kim · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sara Crane
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-11 · CX 7.5 LT Kim · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chito Lam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-03 · NEO/Banas/X40&Over8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lion Moeliono mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-02 · NEO/Banas/X40&Over8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lion Moeliono mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-25 · C 8.5W LT Kim · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sara Crane
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-09-19 · NEO/Banas/X40&Over8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lion Moeliono mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-19 · NEO/Banas/X40&Over8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lion Moeliono mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · A18 4.0W LT Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Traci Schimpf
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · A40 4.0W LT Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karyn Loveless
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · A18 4.0W LT Kim · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-08 · A40 4.0W LT Kim · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 44.7% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
54.2%
52W–44L · 51.4% of games
4.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.5% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.6% of games
7.5
56.4%
22W–17L · 52.3% of games
8.5
47.6%
10W–11L · 53.2% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
56W–28L · 56.8% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
101 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
47 matches
#1 Singles
11%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
11 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe