← Search

Henry Boyd

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wilmington, NC
4.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 17W–30L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history47 matches
L
2025-07-31 · Hilliard · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Meredith Cramer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-07 · Hilliard · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hanna Davis mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2023-05-04 · Barefoot · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with FORREST MAREADY
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2023-04-16 · Barefoot · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paul Richards
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2023-03-28 · Barefoot · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Li
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2022-08-03 · Mason · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jean Nichols mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2022-07-21 · Mason · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jean Nichols mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2022-06-28 · Mason · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jean Nichols mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2022-06-14 · Mason · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amanda Mason mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2022-05-19 · Barefoot 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kenner Stierwalt
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2022-04-24 · Barefoot 4.5 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with FORREST MAREADY
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2022-04-05 · Barefoot 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ed Vogelsong
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.1% of games
4.5
23.5%
4W–13L · 42.1% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 60.9% of games
8.5
40%
4W–6L · 44.9% of games
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 51% of the time
#3 Doubles
51%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
5 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams