← Search

Kathy Beggs

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tallahassee, FL
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 64W–64L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history128 matches
W
2026-10-29 · Herring · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elaine Rudd
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-08 · Herring · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carson Parker
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-11 · LEON/Morgan-Gates · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Marie Chupa
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-04 · LEON/Morgan-Gates · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pia Lehtonen
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-14 · LEON/Morgan-Gates · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pia Lehtonen
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2024-11-21 · Herring · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen de Cardenas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-11-18 · Nichols · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Whitlock
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-10-17 · Herring · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sherry Cady
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2024-10-16 · Herring · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen de Cardenas
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-10-03 · Herring · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen de Cardenas
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-09-05 · Herring · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brenda Jahn
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-08-26 · Nichols · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Nichols
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
44.4%
24W–30L · 47.1% of games
7.5
48.1%
26W–28L · 51.2% of games
8.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 47.2% of games
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.6% of games
7.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
34 matches
Singles
5%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert