← Search

Erica Gregory

— year-end
9 matches · 2W–7L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Erica Gregory to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history9 matches
L
2026-06-07 · HARBOR PT 18AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Oclassen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-23 · HARBOR PT 18AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Markell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · HARBOR PT 55AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Markell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-17 · HARBOR PT 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dee Dee Littrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-03 · HARBOR PT 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcella Savino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-25 · HARBOR PT 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marjorie Schlenoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-07 · HARBOR PT 40AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Mark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-01-17 · HARBOR PT 40AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Oclassen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-09-06 · HARBOR PT CW6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Teams6 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.6% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova