Stephen Kispersky
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saratoga, CA
54 matches · 16W–38L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history54 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 5-7
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2025
BROOKSIDE 40MX7.0A
BROOKSIDE 40MX7.0A
SARATOGA CC S70M6.0A
BROOKSIDE 40MX7.0A
LADERA OAKS 18AM3.0A
SARATOGA CC 40AM3.0A
SARATOGA CC 40MX6.0A
BROOKSIDE 40MX7.0A
BROOKSIDE 40AM3.0A
BROOKSIDE 40MX7.0A
SARATOGA CC 55MX7.0A
BROOKSIDE 18AM3.0A
BROOKSIDE 18AM3.5A
BROOKSIDE 18MX7.0A
BROOKSIDE 40AM3.0A
BROOKSIDE 40AM3.5A
BROOKSIDE 55AM7.0A
BROOKSIDE CM6.5A
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 47.3% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 36% of games
6.0
40%
2W–3L · 55.3% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
11.8%
2W–15L · 38.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
6 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.