← Search

Sara Wachs

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
NAPLES, FL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
237 matches · 148W–89L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history237 matches
W
2026-10-31 · Riverstone / Bonacci · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hans Vriens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-26 · Glen Eagle / Newhall · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Monica Jimenez
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-04-19 · Riverstone / Bonacci · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jordan Rieks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-18 · Riverstone / Bonacci · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jordan Rieks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
Mary Miranda-Del Rossi / MacKenzie Rickman
2026-04-16 · Glen Eagle / Newhall · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jane Jhanji
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-07 · Riverstone / Bonacci · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hans Vriens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-02-28 · COLLIER/Becker · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Mccarthy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
Dayna Webre / MacKenzie Rickman
2026-02-26 · Winter Winners/Glen Eagle / Newhall · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Rogers
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-02-12 · Winter Winners/Glen Eagle / Newhall · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sonia Denoncourt
loading the estimate
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-07 · COLLIER/Becker · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Wright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-02-06 · COLLIER/ Glen Eagle / Matje · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sonia Denoncourt
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-01-30 · COLLIER/ Glen Eagle / Matje · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michelle Rogers
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.5
60.1%
89W–59L · 54.6% of games
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 60.9% of games
9.0
65.4%
17W–9L · 55.4% of games
9.5
75%
6W–2L · 61.5% of games
8.0mixed
73.9%
34W–12L · 61.4% of games
8.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
86 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
64 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#3 Mixed Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova