← Search

Tricia Reeks

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Asheville, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
200 matches · 110W–90L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history200 matches
L
2026-10-18 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Meacham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-07 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Meacham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-26 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Haycook
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-21 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janet Sweezey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-19 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Pryately championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-18 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Weinrib championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-17 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Pryately championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-09 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anne Salter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Meacham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-29 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dorothy Singhal
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Josie Thomas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-22 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Meacham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams67 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
60.5%
23W–15L · 53.3% of games
4.0
35.8%
24W–43L · 46.4% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
74.5%
41W–14L · 59.4% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
0%
0W–4L · 29% of games
4.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 46.5% of games
8.0mixed
69.6%
16W–7L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
65 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova