← Search

William Hickl

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sugar Land, TX
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 37W–39L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history76 matches
L
2026-10-29 · Sugar Creek - Dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gary Edmiaston
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-22 · Sugar Creek - Dawgs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gary Edmiaston
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-15 · Sugar Creek - Dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Barry
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-08 · Sugar Creek - Dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gary Edmiaston
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-26 · Sugar Creek - Beer 30 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with CHRISTOPHER BARTON
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-19 · Sugar Creek - Beer 30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryce Cooper
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-05 · Sugar Creek - Beer 30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gary Sparks
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-11-21 · Sugar Creek - Beer 30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Latimer
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-11-07 · Sugar Creek - Beer 30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Latimer
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Prince
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2024-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gary Edmiaston
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2024-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gary Edmiaston
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
51.5%
34W–32L · 49.4% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 27.1% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer