← Search

Theresa Gallagher

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
West Chester, PA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 16W–31L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history47 matches
L
2025-08-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Mcnabb
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Mcnabb
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2024-08-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Crowe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-08-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Mcnabb
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Crowe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2023-08-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Mcnabb
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2023-08-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Mcnabb
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-07-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Mcnabb
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2023-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Mcnabb
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-04-14 · Rogue · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katharine Eaton
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2023-02-20 · Rogue · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Lacey
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-01-09 · Rogue · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hetal Vidwans
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
14.8%
4W–23L · 34.5% of games
7.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 51.3% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 53% of the time
#3 Doubles
53%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams