← Search

Tracey Bean

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Peterborough, NH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 31W–34L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history65 matches
L
2026-06-21 · MITC:Morison:Olney · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Glenn Peck mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · MITC:Morison:Olney · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Bennett mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-04 · HH:Fortier:LInder · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer McCalmont
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-01-30 · MITC:Harrington:Foley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debra Williamson
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-11-07 · MITC:Harrington:Foley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Gordon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-2
L
2024-02-15 · MITC:HitFreeOrDie:Harrington:Foley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Caulton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-02-11 · MITC:Harrington:Samuelson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Sordillo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2024-02-11 · MITC:Harrington:Samuelson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Sordillo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2024-02-05 · MITC:Harrington:Samuelson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Sordillo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-01-14 · MITC:Harrington:Samuelson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Bennett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2023-11-16 · MITC:HitFreeOrDie:Harrington:Foley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Caulton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
2023-06-10 · MITC:Harrington:Porowski · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Sordillo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
66.7%
16W–8L · 53.3% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.7% of games
8.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.5% of games
8.0mixed
40.9%
9W–13L · 44.7% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
17 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer