← Search

Roxanne Parker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Smith, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
226 matches · 88W–138L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history226 matches
W
Default
2026-10-20 · Parker/FS/CM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Glenna Gilliam
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-19 · Parker/FS/CM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Glenna Gilliam
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-10-08 · Killough/VB/CM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dawn Stovall
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-06 · Parker/FS/CM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cathy Rollinson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-10-04 · Parker/FS/CM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cathy Rollinson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-16 · Parker/FS/CM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cathy Rollinson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-15 · Killough/VB/CM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Huckelbury
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-08 · Killough/VB/CM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Teresa Brooks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-01 · Killough/VB/CM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Teresa Brooks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-11 · Harp/FS/CM · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Victoria Cormier
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-28 · Gilliam/FS/HO · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Cormier
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-21 · Harp/FS/CM · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Victoria Cormier
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
72.4%
21W–8L · 59.5% of games
3.25
53.3%
8W–7L · 52.7% of games
3.5
30.3%
30W–69L · 42.3% of games
3.75
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 33.2% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 72% of games
6.5
38.6%
17W–27L · 45.9% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 25.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
28 matches
#1 Singles
11%
25 matches
#2 Singles
6%
13 matches
Singles
6%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams