← Search

Diana Panucci

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charleston, WV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 58W–72L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history130 matches
L
2026-10-25 · CTC Panucci · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Mitias
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-24 · CTC Panucci · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-03 · CTC Panucci · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Spriggs
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-27 · TIC Ream · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Gretchen Prather
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-23 · CTC Korwan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Miri Hunter
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-13 · CTC Korwan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Korwan
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-04 · YMCA Hinkle-Mabe · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cheryl Spriggs
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · #2 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-31 · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-08 · YMCA Hinkle-Mabe · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Christine Minardi
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-30 · CTC Korwan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Veloso
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.2% of games
3.5
60.8%
31W–20L · 55.6% of games
4.0
32.6%
14W–29L · 40.4% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.7% of games
7.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 24% of the time
#3 Doubles
24%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
28 matches
#1 Singles
19%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
21 matches
#2 Singles
10%
13 matches
Singles
8%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer