← Search

David Caza

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
BEDFORD, NH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 10W–12L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history22 matches
W
2026-06-20 · ALG:OldGaloots:Gould:Warren · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Baron
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-30 · ALG:OldGaloots:Gould:Warren · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Brock
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-19 · ALG: Warren:Gould · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Warren
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-06-21 · ALG: Warren:Gould · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Puderbaugh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-14 · ALG: Warren:Gould · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denis Vaillancourt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-04-02 · ALG:Duckless · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rick Leclerc
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-5
L
2023-02-19 · ALG:Duckless · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rick Depasquale
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2023-02-04 · ALG:Duckless · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Duckless
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-5
L
2022-05-01 · ALG:Duckless · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rick Leclerc
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2022-01-30 · ALG:Duckless · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rick Depasquale
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
W
2020-02-16 · ALG:Duckless8.0-55 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rick Leclerc
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2020-01-05 · ALG:Duckless8.0-55 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rick Paquin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
40%
4W–6L · 44.9% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 49% of games
8.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
7 matches
#1 Singles
23%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
4 matches
#2 Singles
9%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer