← Search

Ryan Adamonis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Windham, NH
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
259 matches · 166W–93L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history259 matches
L
2026-10-30 · CED:Cedardale:Adamonis · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sharon Kamens mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-30 · CED:Cedardale:Adamonis · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sharon Kamens mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-30 · CED:Cedardale:Adamonis · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sharon Kamens mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · BRTC:Bass River:Uttard · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jason Sechrist
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · CED:Cedardale:Adamonis · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sharon Kamens mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · CED:Cedardale:Adamonis · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sharon Kamens mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-26 · CED:Cedardale:Adamonis · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sharon Kamens mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-16 · BRTC:Bass River:Uttard · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Alejandro P Andres
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-08 · BRTC:Bass River:Uttard · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jaye Horvath
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-01 · BRTC:Bass River:Uttard · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jason Sechrist
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · CED:Cedardale:Adamonis · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sharon Kamens mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-16 · CED:Cedardale:Adamonis · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sharon Kamens mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
82.6%
19W–4L · 60.6% of games
5.0
42.4%
14W–19L · 49.6% of games
10.0mixed
41.4%
12W–17L · 48.5% of games
8.0mixed
92.3%
36W–3L · 64.7% of games
9.0mixed
62.9%
83W–49L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
129 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
85 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
29 matches
#1 Singles
5%
13 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer