← Search

Tom Minton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Santa Fe, NM
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 5W–21L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history26 matches
L
2024-10-26 · NNM/Grayson/Adult 40&Over/3.5M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Harrington
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-09-07 · NNM/Grayson/Adult 40&Over/3.5M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Harrington
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-04-14 · NNM 3.5M EG - Thatch · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Martin
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2022-06-11 · NNM 3.5M EG - Baker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mitch Noonan
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-05-01 · NNM 3.5M EG - Baker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edward Baca
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2021-10-30 · NNM 7.0MX EG - Johnson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marlene Klingel mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2021-10-16 · NNM 7.0MX EG - Johnson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marlene Klingel mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2021-10-02 · NNM 7.0MX EG - Johnson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Birch mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2021-09-18 · NNM 7.0MX EG - Johnson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Graves mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
W
2021-09-11 · NNM 7.0MX EG - Johnson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marlene Klingel mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
L
2019-11-10 · NNM3.5M40_Baker_EG · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Pate
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2019-11-09 · NNM3.5M40_Baker_EG · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Pate
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 42.1% of games
7.0mixed
15.4%
2W–11L · 35.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe