← Search

Stacy Rivardo

WOODSTOCK, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
46 matches · 13W–33L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Stacy sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Stacy is one of 1468 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 33% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Stacy has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.02020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Stacy has gone from the 8th to the 1st percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
30%
9W–21L · 42.8% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 29.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history46 matches
W
Susan Hall / Clancey McCray
2023-01-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with MacKenzie Wallace
+0.063better than expected — took 80% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Darlene Johnson / Beth Hudson
2023-01-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melody Franz
−0.049below expectation — took 20% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Nicki NeSmith / Carla Bruno
2023-01-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rosalind Rosenburg
−0.007about as expected — took 43% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Melissa Adams / Becca Cline
2022-12-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Aselton
+0.016about as expected — took 35% of games against 33% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
2022-09-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laurie Wilkins
+0.035better than expected — took 44% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2022-09-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Jordt
−0.031below expectation — took 0% of games against 29% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Juanita Kraght / Mary Jo Leonardson
2022-09-17 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robin Aronson
+0.045better than expected — took 71% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2022-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Hansberry
+0.025about as expected — took 14% of games against 17% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Amy Franck / Renee Sedghinasab
2022-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laurie Wilkins
+0.011about as expected — took 44% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
2022-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Aronson
−0.017below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Diane Lee / Jackie Fuller
2022-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Aronson
+0.019better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Kyung Mi Lee / Lara Dabbs
2022-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Hansberry
+0.011about as expected — took 56% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.