← Search

Jered Freed

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Evans, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 135W–49L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history184 matches
W
2026-10-15 · CCRC/Narendran · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikhil Narendran
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-10-06 · CCRC/Fanning · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan McKibben
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-10-06 · CCRC/Narendran · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcus Tebbs
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-29 · CCRC/Fanning · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Neal
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-27 · CCRC/Fanning · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Mallory
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-17 · CCRC/Narendran · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcus Tebbs
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-09-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Anne Moore mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-09-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Trammell mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Anne Moore mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Trammell mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-25 · CCRC/Fanning · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Cantrell
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · CSRATA/Steve Fanning · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Clifford
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
96%
24W–1L · 66.7% of games
4.0
67.3%
76W–37L · 57% of games
6.0
80%
4W–1L · 59.6% of games
7.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 61.3% of games
7.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.3% of games
8.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 60.9% of games
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 52.5% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
25 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova