← Search

Conner Schiller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Austin, TX
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 6W–6L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history12 matches
L
2026-06-28 · Southside Bangers 2.0 · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-31 · Southside Bangers 2.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Travis Lenz
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan van de Water
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with William Huntington
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-06-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Srivanth Navaneethakrishnasamy
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-06-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with William Huntington
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-06-08 · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2022-03-26 · OC Team Impact -RCI - Matt · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Trina Eggers mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2022-02-13 · OC Team Impact -RCI - Matt · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Trina Eggers mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
2022-02-12 · OC Team Impact -RCI - Matt · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Trina Eggers mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
W
2022-01-30 · OC Team Impact -RCI - Matt · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Trina Eggers mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2022-01-29 · OC Team Impact -RCI - Matt · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Maria O'Connor mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.5% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 41.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
2 matches
#1 Singles
8%
1 match
#2 Singles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams