← Search

Clarence Lewis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 1W–13L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history14 matches
L
2026-06-09 · HV-Shields 55s 7.0M F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Belcher
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-26 · HV-Shields 55s 7.0M F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rocco Pisto
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-27 · 1HV-SHIELDS AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Belcher
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-23 · 1HV-SHIELDS AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with August Meyers
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-02 · 1HV-SHIELDS AD55&O TU 70 MEN SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Belcher
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-10 · 5HV-BAHROU AD40&O MO 35 MEN SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with DAVID GIBB
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2023-07-07 · 1HV-KING MIX18&O 70 SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Lewis mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2022-08-16 · 5HV-COFFEY 7.0 18&O MIXED SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Petra Schroeder mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-07-22 · 5HV-COFFEY 7.0 18&O MIXED SEM F1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Lewis mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2019-07-01 · 4HV-FERGUSON 35MEN 18 MON SEM F4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with M P Narayanan
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2019-06-19 · 4HV-FERGUSON 35MEN 40 WED SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alan Franson
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2019-06-10 · 4HV-FERGUSON 35MEN 18 MON SEM F4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ed Kulik
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 36.2% of games
7.0
0%
0W–5L · 27.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 71% of the time
#3 Doubles
71%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal