← Search

Andrew Inabnet

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Shreveport, LA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
116 matches · 76W–40L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history116 matches
W
2026-10-19 · Lauseng/18/7.5/CM/BTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gregor Ghali
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-10-12 · Lauseng/18/7.5/CM/BTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Slattery Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-29 · Floyd-Anderson/18/8.5/CM/BTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Levi Holley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-28 · Lauseng/18/7.5/CM/BTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jesse Waller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-22 · Floyd-Anderson/18/8.5/CM/BTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marc Paz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-09-15 · Floyd-Anderson/18/8.5/CM/BTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Levi Holley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · Lauseng/18/7.5/CM/BTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gregor Ghali
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-09-01 · Floyd-Anderson/18/8.5/CM/BTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Eric MacLin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · Floyd-Anderson/18/8.5/CM/BTC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marc Paz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-18 · Floyd-Anderson/18/8.5/CM/BTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marc Paz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-18 · LA 4.5M 18 & Over (Floyd) · #2 Singles · 4.5 championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-18 · LA 4.5M 18 & Over (Floyd) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Levi Holley championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 68.1% of games
4.0
77.3%
34W–10L · 57.1% of games
4.5
50%
4W–4L · 51.9% of games
7.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 51.9% of games
8.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 52% of games
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.1% of games
4.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 59.6% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
29 matches
Singles
12%
14 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer