← Search

Clyde Fuller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Austin, TX
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 8W–44L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history52 matches
L
2026-03-29 · Balcones Smart Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sabra Fuller mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-01 · Balcones Smart Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sabra Fuller mixed
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-14 · Balcones Smart Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sabra Fuller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sabra Fuller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-03-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sabra Fuller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-2
L
2025-03-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sabra Fuller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kurt Prossner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rob Nester
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-10-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sabra Fuller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sabra Fuller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Kelley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sabra Fuller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 44.1% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 28.6% of games
7.0mixed
15.8%
3W–16L · 32.9% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–11L · 21.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 58% of the time
#3 Doubles
58%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert