← Search

Jeff Dannick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Springfield, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
145 matches · 40W–105L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history145 matches
L
2026-09-20 · Team 4 Zaret · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Ford
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-6
L
2026-09-05 · Team 4 Zaret · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frederic Colas
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-02 · Team 1 Pirates Over 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Megan Burski Wells mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-29 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Buhl championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · Team 1 Pirates Over 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debbie Cafferty mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-31 · Team 1 Pirates Over 55 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberlee Overdeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-21 · Team 3 Pirates Over 40 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barry Dickman
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-19 · Team 3 Pirates Over 40 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Luftglass
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · Team 3 Pirates Over 40 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Austin Wells
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-03-22 · Team 4 Pirates Over 40 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Brown
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-15 · Team 4 Pirates Over 40 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Dorsk
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-01-18 · Team 4 Pirates Over 40 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Rosenblum
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
33.3%
8W–16L · 44.8% of games
4.5
18.6%
13W–57L · 36.5% of games
8.0
48.3%
14W–15L · 50.3% of games
9.0
30%
3W–7L · 38.8% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 39.8% of games
8.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.9% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
36 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer