← Search

Susan Hughes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Kennett Square, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 35W–24L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history59 matches
L
2026-10-14 · KSGCC Triple Threat · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sanna Neilson
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-30 · KSGCC Triple Threat · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristine OMalley
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-11 · Rock Paper Scissors · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Alicknavitch
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · Rock Paper Scissors · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lee Alexander
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-07 · Rock Paper Scissors · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paula Piercy
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-30 · Rock Paper Scissors · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diane Maund
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diane Maund
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Beeson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Meg Lawrence
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-07-08 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Beeson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Beeson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
W
2024-07-23 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Crowe
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
60%
27W–18L · 56% of games
8.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe