Marjeanne Camp
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Beverly Hills, MI
63 matches · 37W–26L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history63 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-7
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Lisa Coyle / Lauren Eaton
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2025
1FAC-LAU 80DW MO 55&O SEM F1
2FAC-LAU AD55&O MO 80 AMW SEM F1
2FAC-LAU AD55&O WED 80 NW SEM
FAC-BLUME AD55&O TH 90 NW SEM
1FAC-LAU AD55&O 80NW WED SEM
1FAC-ROOSEN AD55&O 80DW MO SEM F1
3FAC-BARTHOLOMEW 8.0 mix 40&O SEM f3
4FAC-MERTZ 80NW 55&O AD WED SEM
1BRC-SNELL 40NW 18&O AD TUES SEM F2
1FAC-BARTHOLOMEW 40DW 40&O AD WED SEM F2
1FAC-BARTHOLOMEW 8.0 40&O Mixed SEM F3
1FAC-ECKERT 45NW 18&O AD WED SEM
1FAC-MERTZ 80NW 55&O AD WED SEM
3FAC-ROOSEN 80DW 55&O AD MON SEM
3SCWB-PAWL 40NW 40&O AD THURS SEM F4
4FAC-BARTHOLOMEW 8.0 18&O MIXED SEM F4
2BRC-SNELL 40nw 18 tues sem F1
4BEV-SNELL 40&OVER 80MIX F3
4BEV-STEIN 8.0 55 MIX SEM
drop FAC-COUR 40nw 40 thur sem F
drop FAC-COUR 45+nw 40 mon sem F
drop FAC-MERTZ 80nw 55 wed sem F
drop FAC-PLAMPER 40dw 40 wed sem F
drop july 6 FAC-BARTHOLOMEW 40dw 18 mon sem F2
1BEV-STEIN 8.0 mix 55 & over sem
1FAC-KAZANJIAN 85 combo women SEM F3
2BEV-SNELL 80 mix 40&O sem f3
2TROY-LIVINGSTON 40NW 40 THUR SEM F3
3FAC-BARTHOLOMEW 40DW 18 MON SEM F1
3FAC-COUR 45+NW 40 MON SEM
3FAC-KIRSCHENBAUM 40NW 18 TUES SEM F5
4BEV-SNELL 8.0 mix 18&O sem f3
4FAC-ROOSEN 80DW 55 MON SEM F2
4SCWB-HACK 80NW 55 WED SEM F2
6FAC-MERTZ 40DW 40 WED SEM F2
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 56.7% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
55%
11W–9L · 55.6% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 51.5% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
14 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.