← Search

Nannette Cassidy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
PUNTA GORDA, FL
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 14W–20L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history34 matches
L
2026-03-04 · Babcock National- Revis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samantha Edwards
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-25 · Babcock National- Revis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Youmans
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-02-11 · Babcock National- Revis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samantha Edwards
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-01-28 · Babcock National- Revis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie LeVan
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-10 · Babcock - Revis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim McCartney
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-27 · Babcock - Revis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim McCartney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-10-20 · Babcock - Revis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim McCartney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-02-19 · Babcock National- Jicha · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Stack
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2024-01-29 · Babcock National- Jicha · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Stack
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
L
2024-01-20 · Babcock National- Jicha · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Hanten
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
L
2023-03-27 · GreyHawk - Hulbert · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Hulbert
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
W
2023-03-09 · Esplanade - Teberg · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Teberg
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 27.5% of games
7.0
50%
5W–5L · 48.9% of games
7.5
25%
2W–6L · 45.6% of games
8.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.7% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert