← Search

Sarah Gray

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
PROSPECT, KY
— year-end
39 matches · 16W–23L · seasons 2019–2022
Match history39 matches
W
2022-10-05 · KY/LOU/POLING · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elaine Farris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-09-18 · KY/LOU/POLING/HEFLEY · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sandra Meyerowitz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2022-09-17 · KY/LOU/POLING · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelley Nelson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2022-09-10 · KY/LOU/POLING/HEFLEY · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Hurley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2022-08-20 · KY/LOU/POLING · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Phylis Jasnoff
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2022-08-06 · KY/LOU/POLING/HEFLEY · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tammy Pollock
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2022-08-05 · KY/LOU/POLING · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelley Nelson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2022-07-29 · KY/LOU/POLING/HEFLEY · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Hurley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2022-03-27 · KY/LOU/POLING · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judy Cates
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2022-03-13 · KY/LOU/POLING · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Ryan
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2022-02-27 · KY/LOU/POLING · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Bennett
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2022-02-05 · KY/LOU/POLING · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Ryan
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams9 teams · 2019–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
18.8%
3W–13L · 34.9% of games
7.5
56.5%
13W–10L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
4 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova