← Search

Paul Doty

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lake Peekskill, NY
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 8W–14L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history22 matches
L
2026-08-04 · JV Club Fit:JV Tennisologists · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Sullivan championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-27 · JV Club Fit:JV Tennisologists · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Sullivan
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-22 · JV Club Fit:JV Tennisologists · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Sullivan
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · Club Fit JV BC 40M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Fairweather
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-26 · Club Fit JV BC 40M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Fairweather
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-29 · JV Club Fit Tennisologists 55 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Sullivan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-15 · JV Club Fit Tennisologists 55 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Sullivan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-18 · Club Fit Jefferson Valley 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edward Palumbo
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eduard Vantrigt
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Sullivan
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2024-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jiarui Wang
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-07-02 · Club Fit JV · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Fairweather
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 26.5% of games
7.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams