← Search

Mary Ellen Mastromatteo

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sandwich, MA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 18W–11L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history29 matches
W
2025-05-08 · MCAC:Hoagland · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Mingle
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-04-24 · MCAC:Hoagland · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rosanne Panio
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-1, 1-0
L
2025-04-17 · MCAC:Hoagland · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judie Garcia
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 5-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-10 · MCAC:Hoagland · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Netty Hoagland
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-04-03 · MCAC:Hoagland · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judie Garcia
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-08-01 · MCAC:Harris:Harris/Sullivan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Murphy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
W
2024-07-18 · MCAC:Harris:Harris/Sullivan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Murphy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 5-4
W
2024-06-20 · MCAC:Harris:Harris/Sullivan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Sullivan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-05-02 · MCAC:Hoagland:Hoagland · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joyce Taber
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-04-18 · MCAC:Hoagland:Hoagland · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elaine Brennan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2023-07-06 · MCAC:Harris:Harris/Sullivan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Sullivan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-2, 0-1
L
2023-06-08 · MCAC:Harris:Harris/Sullivan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betty Ann Davis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
62.1%
18W–11L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams