← Search

Patti Baker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cincinnati, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 60W–50L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history110 matches
L
2026-05-28 · Queen City Green · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tere West-Arroyo
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-07-31 · Queen City Purple · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Eberly
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 4-3
W
2025-07-15 · Queen City Silver · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Hecker
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-3
L
2025-07-10 · Queen City Purple · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Eberly
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-5
W
2025-06-24 · Queen City Silver · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-06-19 · Queen City Purple · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Connie Allen
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 3-5
L
2025-06-12 · Queen City Purple · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Connie Allen
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-4, 0-1
L
2025-06-03 · Queen City Silver · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 2-3
W
2025-05-29 · Queen City Purple · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Connie Allen
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 5-2
W
2024-07-18 · Queen City Purple · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Eberly
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 4-2
L
2024-06-20 · Queen City Purple · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tracy Tschida
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
2024-06-13 · Queen City Purple · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Nye
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
55.4%
41W–33L · 51.5% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
8.0
54.8%
17W–14L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
26 matches
#1 Singles
17%
19 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer