← Search

Jane Quehl

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Newburgh, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
202 matches · 103W–99L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history202 matches
L
2026-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Kineman championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Kineman championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-20 · Conrad · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rhonda Williams
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-10-13 · Conrad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Conrad
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-06 · Conrad · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Haley
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-29 · Conrad · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with MAKO HOSOKAWA
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-27 · KY/HEN/INGALLS, Liz 40 and Over Combo · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stacy Lambert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-09-12 · KY/HEN/MARKWELL, Gayle · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katrina Cutshaw championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-11 · KY/HEN/MARKWELL, Gayle · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Ingalls championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-30 · KY/HEN/INGALLS, Liz 40 and Over Combo · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stacy Lambert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-23 · KY/HEN/INGALLS, Liz 40 and Over Combo · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalia Fletcher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-02 · KY/HEN/INGALLS, Liz 40 and Over Combo · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Monica Warren
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 56.8% of games
3.5
51.7%
62W–58L · 50.6% of games
6.5
45%
9W–11L · 49.1% of games
7.5
9.1%
1W–10L · 37.7% of games
3.0mixed
59.1%
13W–9L · 49.5% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 51% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
26 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert