← Search

Jennifer Kinder

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dallas, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
199 matches · 111W–88L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history199 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Team 11 Fretz/Montgomery-Kinder W3.0S · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Sowards
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-10-23 · Team 43 Spring Park/Nolen-Hager W3.0F · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsea Larson
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-10-11 · Team 11 Fretz/Montgomery-Kinder W3.0S · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Looney
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-10-04 · Team 11 Fretz/Montgomery-Kinder W3.0S · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Carey
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-09-27 · Team 11 Fretz/Montgomery-Kinder W3.0S · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Montgomery
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-18 · Team 43 Spring Park/Nolen-Hager W3.0F · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Camille Stegich
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · Team 11 Fretz/Montgomery-Kinder W3.0S · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Looney
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-22 · Team 5 Teri Wilson/Sarah Montgomery 6.5W · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Debra Driscoll
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-21 · Team 5 Teri Wilson/Sarah Montgomery 6.5W · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Chris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · Fretz/Montgomery-Kinder W3.0S · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Austry
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · Fretz/Montgomery-Kinder W3.0S · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Montgomery
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-31 · Fretz/Montgomery-Kinder W3.0S · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Montgomery
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
64.8%
68W–37L · 56.3% of games
3.5
27.8%
15W–39L · 40.9% of games
6.5
100%
6W–0L · 62.7% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
65 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
60 matches
Singles
16%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
31 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert