← Search

Linda Morgan-Yatzor

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Essex Junction, VT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 51W–72L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history123 matches
L
2026-09-25 · EE:String Theory:Gale/Demas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Laramee championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-25 · EE:String Theory:Gale/Demas · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peggy Cohen championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-11 · EE:Topsinners:Norotsky/Smith · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Sabalis
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-21 · EE:Topsinners:Norotsky/Smith · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caroline Murphy
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · EE:Topsinners:Norotsky/Smith · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arlene Abadi
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-16 · EE:Topsinners:Norotsky/Smith · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Durieux
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-02 · EE:String Theory:Gale/Demas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Bugbee
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-25 · EE:String Theory:Gale/Demas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peggy Cohen
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-4
W
2026-03-28 · EE:String Theory:Gale/Demas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Laramee
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · EE:Intangibles:Fonseca/Cawley · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judith Wimble
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-07 · EE:Intangibles:Fonseca/Cawley · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peggy Cohen
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-31 · EE:Intangibles:Fonseca/Cawley · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peggy Cohen
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
36.8%
14W–24L · 44.7% of games
4.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 35% of games
7.0
51.5%
17W–16L · 49.4% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 50.6% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 47.7% of games
7.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 52% of games
8.0mixed
29.4%
5W–12L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
33 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer