← Search

Brian Utz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CHICAGO, IL
4.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
94 matches · 54W–40L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history94 matches
L
2026-09-27 · CHI E 18M4.5 1.Tam Shmigelsky Sun 7 $25 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joseph Shmigelsky
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
Default
2026-08-16 · CDTA S M18&O9.0 3.Lake Chang Sun 7 $26 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Emma Forman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-28 · CDTA S M18&O9.0 3.Lake Chang Sun 7 $26 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Emma Forman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · CDTA S 18&OM4.5 4.Wave(OUT) Shmigelsky Sun 7 $12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicholas Silacci
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-31 · CDTA S 18&OM4.5 4.Wave(OUT) Shmigelsky Sun 7 $12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Venil Tummarakota
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-04-12 · CDTA W 18&OM5.0 2.Tam Needler Sun 7 $22 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Guillermo Gomez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-03-28 · CDTA W 18&OM5.0 2.Tam Needler Sun 7 $22 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Brian Lin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-22 · CDTA W 18&OM4.5 3.Tam Shmigelsky Sun 7 $22 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dennis Kontorovich
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-5, 1-0
W
Default
2026-03-22 · CDTA W 18&OM5.0 2.Tam Needler Sun 7 $22 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Peter Neumer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-08 · CDTA W 18&OM4.5 3.Tam Shmigelsky Sun 7 $22 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicholas Silacci
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-03-01 · CDTA W M18&O10.0 1.Tam Copland Sun 3 $22 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Emma Forman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-16 · CDTA W 18&OM4.5 3.Tam Shmigelsky Sun 7 $22 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dennis Kontorovich
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.4% of games
5.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 51.7% of games
10.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 43.1% of games
9.0mixed
71.4%
30W–12L · 58% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
12 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams