← Search

David Arciaga

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
FORT WALTON BEACH, FL
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
32 matches · 4W–28L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history32 matches
L
2025-04-12 · Hughes - Shalimar · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melanie Schweizer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-06 · Hughes - Shalimar · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carly Wilson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-15 · Hughes - Shalimar · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Van Hughes mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 5-7
L
2022-02-26 · Rosemary Beach-Arciaga · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jerry Robinson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
L
2022-02-12 · Rosemary Beach-Arciaga · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jerry Robinson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-02-05 · Rosemary Beach-Arciaga · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Keating
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2021-07-25 · Shalimar Pointe-Arciaga · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cristine Corona Otero mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
W
2021-05-14 · Shalimar Pointe · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Davis mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2021-05-01 · Shalimar Pointe · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Davis mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2021-04-23 · Shalimar Pointe · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Davis mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 5-7
L
2021-04-02 · Shalimar Pointe · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Davis mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2021-03-27 · Shalimar Pointe · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Cotton mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
15%
3W–17L · 33.7% of games
8.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 29.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 59% of the time
#3 Doubles
59%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal