← Search

Kay Lee

— year-end
15 matches · 6W–9L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Kay Lee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Burkwood Cook · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Sobel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-12 · Burkwood Cook · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · Schools/York · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with DAYNA SCHOOLS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · Schools/York · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with DAYNA SCHOOLS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-31 · Burkwood MooreFun · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Mourtzakis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-20 · Burkwood MooreFun · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Mallory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-15 · 4 Burkwood - Krider · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-3
W
2026-07-10 · 4 Burkwood - Krider · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Mourtzakis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · Schools/York · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-29 · Burkwood MooreFun · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Sweeney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · Schools/York · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with DAYNA SCHOOLS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-17 · Schools/York · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with DAYNA SCHOOLS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Teams22 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games
6.0
60%
3W–2L · 48.9% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 35.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 60% of the time
#3 Doubles
60%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer