Search

Debbie Nowakowski

San Diego, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
50 matches · 25W–25L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.25
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
San Diego · 3.5
68 of 77
CA · 3.5
142 of 167
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Debbie is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Debbie has been 3.5 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.5202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Debbie has gone from the 67th to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
46.2%
12W–14L · 48.5% of games
7.0
50%
6W–6L · 49.8% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history50 matches
W
Diana Elia / Christine Johnson
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruby Gardner
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Celia Hernandez / Alicia S Molina
2026-07-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Jimenez
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Jimenez
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 7-5
L
Michelle Simpson / Colleen Hartman
2026-07-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Jimenez
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
L
Christine Johnson / Caroline Mickel
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cecilia Paredes-lopez
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cecilia Paredes-lopez
0.044below expectation — took 33% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Jessica Balli / Meagan McKissick
2026-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edith Limon
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-02-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yasuko Stanley
+0.002about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Endy Sevilla
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-3
L
Viviana Rozo / Michelle Adams
2026-01-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edith Limon
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-0
W
Brian Gee / Kim Grahamchamps
2025-12-12 · #2 Doubles · with Jorge Padilla
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-3
W
Kate Gill / Donna Dube
2025-11-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Nelson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.