← Search

Selena Poling

— year-end
98 matches · 49W–49L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Selena Poling to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
L
2020-11-20 · Wickertree 1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Sara Hughes
2020-10-23 · Wickertree 1 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2020-10-16 · Wickertree 1 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2020-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Logan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Julie Robeson / Heather Evans
2020-10-09 · Wickertree 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Sugar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2020-10-02 · Wickertree 1 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2020-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Denny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2020-09-18 · Wickertree 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy MacDonell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2020-09-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laurel Elmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-5, 1-0
W
2020-03-13 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
Lori Brown / Janet Disbennett
2020-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara DeLuca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2020-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joyce Ellerbrock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 64% of games
4.0
46.4%
26W–30L · 48.5% of games
7.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 46.1% of games
8.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 43.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
20 matches
#2 Singles
16%
16 matches
#1 Singles
15%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams