← Search

Claudia Gomes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Miami, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
155 matches · 82W–73L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history155 matches
W
2026-10-20 · Persevere Players at Coral Reef · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Yolanda Sosa
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-16 · Coral Reef Court Cuties · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Yolanda Sosa
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-12-08 · Coral Reef Court Cuties · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Adela Tichacek
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2025-11-17 · Coral Reef Court Cuties · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jackie Thayer
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-03 · Coral Reef Court Cuties · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beatriz Terry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-20 · Coral Reef Court Cuties · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beatriz Terry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-10-06 · Coral Reef Court Cuties · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beatriz Terry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 0-6
W
2025-09-29 · Coral Reef Court Cuties · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sharon Glick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-03-17 · Ageless Allies · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Yolanda Sosa
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-03-10 · Ageless Allies · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Esperanza Bonner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-02-17 · Ageless Allies · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rina Saborio
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-02-03 · Ageless Allies · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Esperanza Bonner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
45.8%
33W–39L · 49.9% of games
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 36.6% of games
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.3% of games
5.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 58.9% of games
6.0
65.6%
21W–11L · 58.9% of games
6.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 46% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
35 matches
#5 Female Doubles
3%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#6 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams