← Search

Gregory Whitmyer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Waldorf, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 33W–67L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history100 matches
L
2026-07-12 · Whitmyer - Athlete 4Ever · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marc Favors
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-11 · Whitmyer - Athlete 4Ever · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marc Favors
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-4
W
2026-06-20 · Whitmyer - Athlete 4Ever · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wayne Powell
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-15 · Whitmyer - Athlete 4Ever · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wayne Powell
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-09 · Sar/Herman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Leihy
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-04 · Whitmyer - Athlete 4Ever · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wayne Powell
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-29 · Whitmyer - Athlete 4Ever · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Medaris Banks
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-15 · Whitmyer - Athlete 4Ever · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Henry Forster
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-04 · Athlete4Ever · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wayne Powell championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-04 · Athlete4Ever · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wayne Powell championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
Michael Hastings / John Fishwick
2025-09-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Leihy championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Lusby championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
0%
0W–7L · 40% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 25.8% of games
7.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 53% of games
8.0
40.5%
17W–25L · 47% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
26 matches
Singles
26%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova