← Search

James Scammon

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New London, NH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 39W–36L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history75 matches
L
2026-10-31 · NPT:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Murphy
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-10-10 · NPT:Deacon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Al Matthews
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-26 · NPT:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Murphy
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-09-12 · NPT:Deacon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gregg Norris
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · NPT:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Zeller
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-18 · NPT:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Best
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-03-21 · NPT:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Best
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-07 · NPT:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ted Farnham
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-21 · NPT:Deacon · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Best
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-02-07 · NPT:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gregg Norris
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-24 · NPT:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christopher Murphy
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-03 · NPT:Deacon · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christopher Murphy
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
64.5%
20W–11L · 56.1% of games
4.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 41.8% of games
7.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 52.3% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
43%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
8 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer