← Search

Mari Bickmore

Salt Lake City, UT
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
326 matches · 87W–239L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mari Bickmore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history326 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Liberty Park-Swalberg · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Hopkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-28 · Liberty Park-Swalberg · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vicki Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-24 · Liberty Park-Swalberg · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melanie Decker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Russo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kylene Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-07-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kalaiselvi Seetharaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jocelyn Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Valerie Rasmussen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacy Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacy Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams87 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games
2.5
50%
19W–19L · 49.9% of games
3.0
23.3%
57W–188L · 38.6% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 22.4% of games
6.0
13.6%
3W–19L · 34.9% of games
5.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
119 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
107 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
39 matches
#1 Singles
6%
18 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
11 matches
#3 Female Doubles
3%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer