← Search

Chelsea Jacobs

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rochester Hills, MI
— year-end
11 matches · 6W–5L · seasons 2019–2019
Match history11 matches
W
2019-07-23 · 2PEACH-DEGUZMAN 40NW 18 TUES SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Brodi
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2019-07-16 · 2PEACH-DEGUZMAN 40NW 18 TUES SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristine Deguzman
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2019-07-09 · 2PEACH-DEGUZMAN 40NW 18 TUES SEM F2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2019-07-02 · 2PEACH-DEGUZMAN 40NW 18 TUES SEM F2 · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2019-06-25 · 2PEACH-DEGUZMAN 40NW 18 TUES SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristine Deguzman
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2019-06-04 · 2PEACH-DEGUZMAN 40NW 18 TUES SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristine Deguzman
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2019-03-10 · 3PEACH-HANLEY 40wsing win sem f1 · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2019-03-08 · 5PEACH-DEGUZMAN 18-39 adult league · #1 Female Doubles · 9.0 · with Devynn Wojdyla
loading the estimate
6-7
L
Jessica Kruczek / Peter Wagner
2019-03-08 · 5PEACH-DEGUZMAN 18-39 adult league · #2 Mixed Doubles · 9.0 · with Joshua Lattie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6
W
2019-02-23 · 3PEACH-HANLEY 40wsing win sem f1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2019-01-26 · 3PEACH-HANLEY 40wsing win sem f1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams3 teams · 2019–2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 59.3% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
2 matches
#2 Singles
18%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
9%
1 match
#2 Doubles
9%
1 match
#2 Mixed Doubles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams