← Search

Leslie Roccario

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Averill Park, NY
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 22W–23L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history45 matches
L
2026-07-08 · Bionic Women · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Gottlieb
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-24 · Bionic Women · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Lott
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-07-21 · Having a Ball · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Suzanne Schaefer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-09 · Having a Ball · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy Breitbart
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2024-08-29 · Wise Aces · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paddi McGrinder
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
W
2024-06-26 · Northern: Acing Gracefully · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janet George
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
L
2024-06-25 · Wise Aces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nina Preston
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-12 · Northern: Acing Gracefully · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Helena Brady
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-05-29 · Northern: Acing Gracefully · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Theresa Cary
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-05-22 · Northern: Acing Gracefully · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elaine Heekin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
L
2022-09-10 · Northern: Wise Aces · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacqueline Falvey championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2022-09-09 · Northern: Wise Aces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Lott championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.3% of games
7.0
50%
12W–12L · 51.4% of games
8.0
50%
3W–3L · 52.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe